🔗 Share this article

The ninth circuit court has upheld a ban on sending national guard in Portland, Oregon, after a recent court ruling.

Judicial Panel Agrees to Rehear Legal Matter

The ninth circuit court of appeals ruled on Tuesday that it would reexamine the legal dispute concerning the president’s authority with an expanded group of 11 judges. The judicial body also overturned a earlier decision from a three-judge panel that had sided with the federal government.

Legal Saga Over Military Presence

This order represents the latest development in a protracted court case over whether the administration has the legal right and justification to send state military units in Portland. Approximately 200 federalized guard members have been in uncertainty since late September when the deployment effort was initiated in response to ongoing demonstrations.

Differing Viewpoints

The administration has argued that federal officials at the ICE facility in south Portland were facing threats, while city and state officials assert that local officers have command of the situation.

In defiance of characterizations of the city as “war ravaged”, residents have been posting videos of lush hiking trails and a vibrant culinary culture, and organizing activities such as an Emergency Naked Bike Ride against the “militarization of our city”.

Recent Legal Actions

The appeals court decision came after a US district judge in Portland issued two legal injunctions this month – one preventing the federal control of the Oregon national guard, and another prohibiting the deployment of any national guard troops in Oregon, after attempts to evade the first order by calling up out-of-state forces.

On the previous day, the appeals court had put the first ruling on hold – allowing command of 200 Oregon national guard – but the subsequent injunction remained in place, blocking the physical sending of the troops.

Full Panel Consideration

The latest ruling means the issue will be heard by the full court – with both rulings under consideration together – by a group of 11 judges.

“This decision shows that the truth matters and that the courts are working to hold this administration accountable. The constitution restricts the president’s power, and Oregon’s communities cannot be treated as a training ground for unchecked federal authority,” said the legal representative in a statement.

“The court is sending a clear message: the executive leader cannot dispatch the armed forces into American urban areas unnecessarily. We will continue protecting Oregon’s laws, principles, and sovereignty as this legal proceeding progresses and our fight continues in the courts.”