🔗 Share this article

We are in Black History Month in the UK, and it appears it’s time for a reassessment. Throughout its history, an event that started out as a festivity and recollection of the past, cultural identity and bonds between international African diaspora communities, has taken on a business-like atmosphere, broadening to incorporate events where Black people are compensated to speak with white audiences about hidden biases and “allyship”. The anti-racism rallies of the last decade generated a rise in the business of displaying cultural sensitivity. But even that moment has passed. The wave has reached its height, resulting in a somewhat empty inheritance of what promoting consciousness is for.

The Background of Black History Observance

Initially celebrated in the US and Canada, Black History Month was established in 1962 as an observance of African American heritage by African American historian Carter G. Woodson with seven days of celebration and reflection in the second week of February. Black History Month evolved from this initiative and was formally inaugurated in 1970. Now it is celebrated not only in the United States and Canada in the second month, but also in autumn in the UK, Deutschland, Éire and the Netherlands.

The observance has transformed since that time, giving reduced attention to the accounts of colonial slavery and civil rights battles, and increasingly on prominent Black figures in politics, culture, and activism, and widely honoring the impact Black people have made to mold society. It is in educational institutions where Black History Month is most frequently marked, with talks and cultural events. But the manner the celebration is celebrated is a manifestation of the current political situation. How it develops is a good lesson in how co-option leads to erosion: the reshaping of Black History Month has hindered the objective of it, which is to tackle systemic and institutional racism.

---

A Disconcerting Period

Hardly anything shows how critical it is to reconsider Black History Month as much as the particular moment in which it falls this year. In the Britain, a resurgent right in the form of the Reform organization is leading the polls. In the recent season we witnessed the most significant ultra-conservative gathering in the history of Britain. the Conservative leader, the African descendant in charge of the Conservative party, is a staunch adversary of the racial justice movement, and we are in a situation where a elected representative feels empowered to declare that a lack of white people in certain urban areas is a cause for alarm. Simultaneously, ultra-nationalist movements are surging in Europe as a entirety.

In the US, a significant offensive against diversity initiatives and positive discrimination has been carried, repeatedly with positive outcomes, to the supreme judicial bodies of the nation. A drive to erase African American heritage and experience from the records is under way. One of Donald Trump's early administrative commands focused on the institution dedicated to Black heritage, and the renowned cultural organization, alleging that they of a coordinated and broad attempt to change the national past” by depicting the United States “as naturally discriminatory”.

Given these circumstances, the month illustrates how minimally it can be effective if it is restricted to either dutiful corporate observances, or politically neutered festivities of former accomplishments, rather than challenging the conditions of the current era. It also shows how its short period means that it is disconnected from the more extensive continuous action that is needed. Denise Miller, a educator at University of Greenwich, articulated it most accurately when she expressed apprehension about the short-term symbolic gestures of the observance. “The problem with adopting a symbolic stance”, she commented, “is that it typically leads to that Black History Month becomes a fleeting performance rather than a driver of transformation.”

---

Reconsidering, Not Discarding

Figuring out how to adapt, revise and extend actions for equal rights and acknowledgment in such times of discouragement and concern is a challenging endeavor. There is a urge to just discontinue events including Black History Month altogether, assuming they are simply not fit for purpose, or are remnants of an era that has been ineffective.

But despite everything, Black History Month, and in fact the complete comprehensive structure and legacy of campaigns for equality – local anti-racism groups, inclusion and equity efforts, and certainly, even commercial engagements – represent an framework that a considerable labor has been dedicated to. It is there not merely to decline as the political landscape shifts (and in fact, regresses), but to be a living breathing thing.

So what would a fresh vibrant Black History Month look like? Firstly, it would be more than a single focused period: something that is dispersed through the year (as some institutions are already starting to implement), elements of its material (particularly around prominent figures of color) incorporated into school curriculums. It would also be a era that does not evade politics, and provides room for individuals, particularly young people, to share their anxieties and narratives. What value has mere awareness of the past when it fails to address the present reality of far-right rallies in the urban areas? Institutions who mark it should not be reassured with the neutral terminology of “unconscious bias” and sensitivity to “microaggressions”, but confronted with the risks that affect everyone if anti-racism is not treated with importance. To summarize, Black History Month should be made current, urgent, and responsive. Perhaps an total re-identification is required – Black History is Now Month.